Shakespeare Rant - To Teach or not to Teach?

Ben Jonson (1572 – 1637): “Shakespeare was not of an age but for all time”.

Okay let me preface this by saying, I’m not trying to force my opinion on anyone and I understand if people just simply don’t like Shakespeare, that’s fine by me, obviously people can have their own opinion and I respect that. This rant is based on a few articles I’ve recently read and a general thought that I’ve seen going around lately; should Shakespeare be taught in the classroom?

Shakespeare is one of my favourite writers in both poetry and plays alike; I believe that all his works are timeless masterpieces. His work includes enduring themes in the arts such as Love, Betrayal, Death (a large amount of that) and his work was extremely revolutionary for his time also dealing with issues such as Racism and Gender fluidity. These themes are obviously still relevant today completely disregarding the argument that “Shakespeare is outdated” or “His works are no longer relevant to modern day”.

Furthermore, if Shakespeare shouldn’t be taught in school, neither should history as the Bard is a vital part of the development of the English Language and plenty of modern works are based on Shakespeare’s classics. Let’s list a few for example.

·         West Side Story (1961) – Based on Romeo and Juliet. Star-crossed lovers (Tony and Maria) meet in opposite sides of a racial gang feud in 1950s New York, obviously ending in tragic fashion.

·         10 Things I Hate About You (1999) – This is pretty much a very close adaptation of Shakespearean comedy The Taming of the Shrew especially with the plot of an unpleasant girl being ‘tamed’ by her love and is often referred to as one of the greatest movies of the 90s.

·         She’s the Man (2006) – Another comedy adaptation, this time of Twelfth Night, where a girl disguises herself as her own (fake) twin brother to join the football team but then falls in love with a guy who is in love with her female self.

·         The Lion King (1994) – Yep, even Disney took inspiration from good ole Will. The story of Simba’s rise to power came from Hamlet. Simba is Hamlet realising his uncle (Scar) killed his father (Mufasa) to take the throne. Timon and Pumba is Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and Nala is Ophelia. There’s even a ghost sequence in Disney’s classic.

·         The Lion King II: Simba’s Pride (1998) – Again, Yep. Disney took inspiration from good ole Will for the sequel too. This one’s Romeo and Juliet; Simba’s daughter falls in love with a lion from Scar’s pride and they must overcome their families anger toward each other to be together. However, there’s less violence in this.

Okay so right there are only a few examples of modern-day adaptations of Shakespeare in the arts. Even if you don’t like those films or adaptations, you must recognise that Shakespeare can’t be as outdated and non-relevant as it first seemed. Additionally, even the classical plays have been shown to become modernised.

The Royal Shakespeare Company has been modernising many plays to keep them suitable for a younger audience and a modern generation. This includes plays such as Hamlet (using guns and set in present day), Macbeth (starring Christopher Eccleston and once again set in present day), Romeo and Juliet (contemporary production based on generation of young people), Titus Andronicus (based in 2017 using the current political landscape as inspiration) and Othello (using a modern-day military operation as a background). With Shakespeare being used in this contemporary fashion, the thought again that Will’s works are not use-able in today’s schooling system is absurd because it’s clearly able to relate to.

Another argument about Shakespeare not being taught in schools, is that it’s language is too difficult because it’s all in ‘Old English’ and therefore difficult to read. I will admit, I understand this criticism more than others due to my own difficulty understanding the writing at first. However, once this language barrier is overcome, the writing is so profound, how is it possible someone could say this is really a problem? Arguably, his most famous quote “To be or not to be” sounds complicated at first look but after an understanding of the meaning, it’s incredibly important as an understanding of humanity, and gaining this understanding at the youngest possible age is incredibly essential especially with our younger generation with the development of social media and video games.

I could go on and on about the importance of Shakespeare both generally for anyone to learn and in the classroom specifically. The main point I’m trying to convey however is that, William Shakespeare was a visionary that was so far past his time with his writing on homosexuality, racism and gender fluidity. With these issues being in the spotlight more than ever today, Shakespeare’s writing is arguably more influential and relevant now than when it was originally written, therefore meaning it is absurd to say it shouldn’t be taught in school as it can obviously related to by today’s and even future generations.

                                                                                                                                                              

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Compare and contrast the ways in which Tolkien and Wilde present the corruption of good in ‘Lord of the Rings’ (1968) and ‘The Picture of Dorian Gray’ (1890).Examine the view that everyday objects can become powerful entities.

Does Hamlet's success as a tragic hero stem from his theatrical creativity, and does Hamm's lack of success correspondingly arise from his insistence on theatrical staleness/repetition?